Comments on: All-Male Eldership, Part 6: Concluding Thoughts

By: Phil Cotnoir

Phil Cotnoir — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:06:12 +0000

I'm a little late getting to the discussion, but I like this: "Clearly, unless there is absolutely not one a single doubt anywhere in your mind that an egalitarian interpretation of Scripture is correct, it only makes sense to remain a complementarian with Paul, Peter and the 2000 years of church history that has followed them."
Having been exposed to a lot of egalitarian arguments in the last few months as a result of studying exegetical methods under one of the leading egalitarian scholars, I've seen that their arguments are very good, very convincing, and not always exegetically manipulative. But, I still have many doubts about their interpretation of Scripture, and I think your words are a wise caution.
Thanks!

By: All-Male Eldership, Part 2: Two Common Objections « Julian Freeman

All-Male Eldership, Part 2: Two Common Objections « Julian Freeman — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:19:07 +0000

[...] Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Conclusion. [...]

By: Ellen

Ellen — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:13:00 +0000

For what it’s worth, a while ago I wrote a post on the “keepers of the home” I believe that we need more men of God bringing up strong men of God to be leaders and more women of God bringing up strong women of God to stand beside them.

By: Julian Freeman

Julian Freeman — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:55:00 +0000

Thanks, Ellen! Your comments have been insightful and very appreciated. Stop by any time!

By: Ellen

Ellen — Thu, 31 May 2007 22:42:00 +0000

Nice series, I’ve enjoyed reading. I’ve also put you in my “favorites” folder.